Skip to ContentGo to accessibility pageKeyboard shortcuts menu
OpenStax Logo
Organic Chemistry

20.4 Substituent Effects on Acidity

Organic Chemistry20.4 Substituent Effects on Acidity

20.4 • Substituent Effects on Acidity

The listing of pKa values shown previously in Table 20.3 indicates that there are substantial differences in acidity from one carboxylic acid to another. For example, trifluoroacetic acid (Ka = 0.59) is 33,000 times as strong as acetic acid (Ka = 1.75 × 10–5). How can we account for such differences?

Because the dissociation of a carboxylic acid is an equilibrium process, any factor that stabilizes the carboxylate anion relative to undissociated carboxylic acid will drive the equilibrium toward increased dissociation and result in increased acidity. For instance, three electron-withdrawing fluorine atoms delocalize the negative charge in the trifluoroacetate anion, thereby stabilizing the ion and increasing the acidity of CF3CO2H. In the same way, glycolic acid (HOCH2CO2H; pKa = 3.83) is stronger than acetic acid because of the electron-withdrawing effect of the electronegative oxygen atom.

The p K a values of acetic (4.76), glycolic (3.83), and trifluoroacetic (-0.23) acids are compared. A horizontal arrow indicates increasing acid strength from acetic through glycolic to trifluoroacetic.

Because inductive effects operate through σ bonds and are dependent on distance, the effect of halogen substitution decreases as the substituent moves farther from the carboxyl. Thus, 2-chlorobutanoic acid has pKa = 2.86, 3-chlorobutanoic acid has pKa = 4.05, and 4-chlorobutanoic acid has pKa = 4.52, similar to that of butanoic acid itself.

The p K a values of 3-chloro (4.52), 2-chloro (4.05), and 1-chloro (2.86) acetic acids are compared. A horizontal arrow indicates increasing acid strength from 3-chloro to 1-chloroacetic acid.

Substituent effects on acidity are also found in substituted benzoic acids. We said during the discussion of electrophilic aromatic substitution in Section 16.4 that substituents on the aromatic ring strongly affect reactivity. Aromatic rings with electron-donating groups are activated toward further electrophilic substitution, and aromatic rings with electron-withdrawing groups are deactivated. Exactly the same effects can be observed on the acidity of substituted benzoic acids (Table 20.4).

Table 20.4 Substituent Effects on the Acidity of p-Substituted Benzoic Acids
The structure of substituted benzoic acid. The substituent Y is placed in the para position of the carboxylic acid group in the benzene ring.
  Y Ka × 10–5 pKa  
A vertical arrow represents the effect of substituents on the acidity of benzoic acid. The bottom part denotes weaker acids (activating groups), and the top part denotes stronger ones (deactivating). –NO2 39 3.41 Deactivating groups
–CN 28 3.55
–CHO 18 3.75
–Br 11 3.96
–Cl 10 4.0
–H  6.46 4.19  
–CH3  4.3 4.34 Activating groups
–OCH3  3.5 4.46
–OH  3.3 4.48

As Table 20.4 shows, an electron-donating (activating) group such as methoxy decreases acidity by destabilizing the carboxylate anion, and an electron-withdrawing (deactivating) group such as nitro increases acidity by stabilizing the carboxylate anion.

The p K a values of p-methoxybenzoic (4.46), benzoic (4.19), and p-nitrobenzoic (3.41) acid are compared. A horizontal arrow indicates increasing acid strength from p-methoxybenzoic to p-nitrobenzoic acid.

Because it’s much easier to measure the acidity of a substituted benzoic acid than it is to determine the relative reactivity of an aromatic ring toward electrophilic substitution, the correlation between the two effects is useful for predicting reactivity. If we want to know the effect of a certain substituent on electrophilic reactivity, we can simply find the acidity of the corresponding benzoic acid. Worked Example 20.1 gives an illustration.

Structures of para-substituted benzoic acid and substituted benzene, both with substituent Y. Text says finding K a of para-substituted benzoic acid allows predicting reactivity of substituted benzene to electrophilic attack.

Worked Example 20.1

Predicting the Effect of a Substituent on the Reactivity of an Aromatic Ring toward Electrophilic Substitution

The pKa of p-(trifluoromethyl)benzoic acid is 3.6. Is the trifluoromethyl substituent an activating or deactivating group in electrophilic aromatic substitution?

Strategy

Decide whether p-(trifluoromethyl)benzoic acid is stronger or weaker than benzoic acid. A substituent that strengthens the acid is a deactivating group because it withdraws electrons, and a substituent that weakens the acid is an activating group because it donates electrons.

Solution

A pKa of 3.6 means that p-(trifluoromethyl)benzoic acid is stronger than benzoic acid, whose pKa is 4.19. Thus, the trifluoromethyl substituent favors dissociation by helping stabilize the negative charge. Trifluoromethyl must therefore be an electron-withdrawing, deactivating group.
Problem 20-6

Which would you expect to be a stronger acid, the lactic acid found in tired muscles or acetic acid? Explain.

Alt Text Placeholder
Problem 20-7
Dicarboxylic acids have two dissociation constants, one for the initial dissociation into a monoanion and one for the second dissociation into a dianion. For oxalic acid, HO2C–CO2H, the first ionization constant is pKa1 = 1.2 and the second ionization constant is pKa2 = 4.2. Why is the second carboxyl group far less acidic than the first?
Problem 20-8
The pKa of p-cyclopropylbenzoic acid is 4.45. Is cyclopropylbenzene likely to be more reactive or less reactive than benzene toward electrophilic bromination? Explain.
Problem 20-9
Rank the following compounds in order of increasing acidity. Don’t look at a table of pKa data to help with your answer.
(a)
Benzoic acid, p-methylbenzoic acid, p-chlorobenzoic acid
(b)
p-Nitrobenzoic acid, acetic acid, benzoic acid
Order a print copy

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Citation/Attribution

This book may not be used in the training of large language models or otherwise be ingested into large language models or generative AI offerings without OpenStax's permission.

Want to cite, share, or modify this book? This book uses the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License and you must attribute OpenStax.

Attribution information
  • If you are redistributing all or part of this book in a print format, then you must include on every physical page the following attribution:
    Access for free at https://openstax.org/books/organic-chemistry/pages/1-why-this-chapter
  • If you are redistributing all or part of this book in a digital format, then you must include on every digital page view the following attribution:
    Access for free at https://openstax.org/books/organic-chemistry/pages/1-why-this-chapter
Citation information

© Jan 9, 2024 OpenStax. Textbook content produced by OpenStax is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License . The OpenStax name, OpenStax logo, OpenStax book covers, OpenStax CNX name, and OpenStax CNX logo are not subject to the Creative Commons license and may not be reproduced without the prior and express written consent of Rice University.