11.8 The E2 Reaction and the Deuterium Isotope Effect
11.8 • The E2 Reaction and the Deuterium Isotope Effect
The E2 reaction (for elimination, bimolecular) occurs when an alkyl halide is treated with a strong base, such as hydroxide ion or alkoxide ion (RO–). It is the most commonly occurring pathway for elimination and can be formulated as shown in Figure 11.18.
Like the SN2 reaction, the E2 reaction takes place in one step without intermediates. As the base begins to abstract H+ from a carbon next to the leaving group, the C–H bond begins to break, a bond begins to form, and the leaving group begins to depart, taking with it the electron pair from the C–X bond. Among the pieces of evidence supporting this mechanism is the fact that E2 reactions show second-order kinetics and follow the rate law: rate = k × [RX] × [Base]. That is, both the base and alkyl halide take part in the rate-limiting step.
A second piece of evidence in support of the E2 mechanism is provided by a phenomenon known as the deuterium isotope effect. For reasons that we won’t go into, a carbon–hydrogen bond is weaker by about 5 kJ/mol (1.2 kcal/mol) than the corresponding carbon–deuterium bond. Thus, a C–H bond is more easily broken than an equivalent C–D bond, and the rate of C–H bond cleavage is faster. For instance, the base-induced elimination of HBr from 1-bromo-2-phenylethane proceeds 7.11 times faster than the corresponding elimination of DBr from 1-bromo-2, 2-dideuterio-2-phenylethane. This result tells us that the C–H (or C–D) bond is broken in the rate-limiting step, consistent with our picture of the E2 reaction as a one-step process. If it were otherwise, we wouldn’t observe a rate difference.
Yet a third piece of mechanistic evidence involves the stereochemistry of E2 eliminations. As shown by a large number of experiments, E2 reactions occur with periplanar geometry, meaning that all four reacting atoms—the hydrogen, the two carbons, and the leaving group—lie in the same plane. Two such geometries are possible: syn periplanar geometry, in which the H and the X are on the same side of the molecule, and anti periplanar geometry, in which the H and the X are on opposite sides of the molecule. Of the two, anti periplanar geometry is energetically preferred because it allows the substituents on the two carbons to adopt a staggered relationship, whereas syn geometry requires that the substituents be eclipsed.
What’s so special about periplanar geometry? Because the sp3 σ orbitals in the reactant C–H and C–X bonds must overlap and become p π orbitals in the alkene product, there must also be some overlap in the transition state. This can occur most easily if all the orbitals are in the same plane to begin with—that is, if they’re periplanar (Figure 11.19).
You can think of E2 elimination reactions with periplanar geometry as being similar to SN2 reactions with 180° geometry. In an SN2 reaction, an electron pair from the incoming nucleophile pushes out the leaving group on the opposite side of the molecule. In an E2 reaction, an electron pair from a neighboring C–H bond also pushes out the leaving group on the opposite side of the molecule.
Anti periplanar geometry for E2 eliminations has specific stereochemical consequences that provide strong evidence for the proposed mechanism. To take just one example, meso-1,2-dibromo-1,2-diphenylethane undergoes E2 elimination on treatment with base to give only the E alkene. None of the isomeric Z alkene is formed because the transition state leading to the Z alkene would have to have syn periplanar geometry and would thus be higher in energy.
Worked Example 11.4
Predicting the Double-Bond Stereochemistry of the Product in an E2 Reaction
What stereochemistry do you expect for the alkene obtained by E2 elimination of (1S,2S)-1,2-dibromo-1,2-diphenylethane?