Chemistry

# 14.7Acid-Base Titrations

Chemistry14.7 Acid-Base Titrations

### Learning Objectives

By the end of this section, you will be able to:
• Interpret titration curves for strong and weak acid-base systems
• Compute sample pH at important stages of a titration
• Explain the function of acid-base indicators

As seen in the chapter on the stoichiometry of chemical reactions, titrations can be used to quantitatively analyze solutions for their acid or base concentrations. In this section, we will explore the changes in the concentrations of the acidic and basic species present in a solution during the process of a titration.

### Titration Curve

Previously, when we studied acid-base reactions in solution, we focused only on the point at which the acid and base were stoichiometrically equivalent. No consideration was given to the pH of the solution before, during, or after the neutralization.

### Example 14.21

#### Calculating pH for Titration Solutions: Strong Acid/Strong Base

A titration is carried out for 25.00 mL of 0.100 M HCl (strong acid) with 0.100 M of a strong base NaOH the titration curve is shown in Figure 14.21. Calculate the pH at these volumes of added base solution:

(a) 0.00 mL

(b) 12.50 mL

(c) 25.00 mL

(d) 37.50 mL

#### Solution

Since HCl is a strong acid, we can assume that all of it dissociates. The initial concentration of H3O+ is $[H3O+]0=0.100M.[H3O+]0=0.100M.$ When the base solution is added, it also dissociates completely, providing OH ions. The H3O+ and OH ions neutralize each other, so only those of the two that were in excess remain, and their concentration determines the pH. Thus, the solution is initially acidic (pH < 7), but eventually all the hydronium ions present from the original acid are neutralized, and the solution becomes neutral. As more base is added, the solution turns basic.

The total initial amount of the hydronium ions is:

$n(H+)0=[H3O+]0×0.02500 L=0.002500 moln(H+)0=[H3O+]0×0.02500 L=0.002500 mol$
14.195

Once X mL of the 0.100-M base solution is added, the number of moles of the OH ions introduced is:

$n(OH−)0=0.100M×X mL×(1 L1000 mL)n(OH−)0=0.100M×X mL×(1 L1000 mL)$
14.196

The total volume becomes: $V=(25.00 mL+X mL)(1 L1000 mL)V=(25.00 mL+X mL)(1 L1000 mL)$

The number of moles of H3O+ becomes:

$n(H+)=n(H+)0−n(OH−)0=0.002500 mol−0.100M×X mL×(1 L1000 mL)n(H+)=n(H+)0−n(OH−)0=0.002500 mol−0.100M×X mL×(1 L1000 mL)$
14.197

The concentration of H3O+ is:

$[H3O+]=n(H+)V=0.002500 mol−0.100M×X mL×(1 L1000 mL)(25.00 mL+X mL)(1 L1000 mL)=0.002500 mol×(1000 mL1 L)−0.100M×X mL25.00 mL+X mL[H3O+]=n(H+)V=0.002500 mol−0.100M×X mL×(1 L1000 mL)(25.00 mL+X mL)(1 L1000 mL)=0.002500 mol×(1000 mL1 L)−0.100M×X mL25.00 mL+X mL$
14.198
$pH=−log([H3O+])pH=−log([H3O+])$
14.199

The preceding calculations work if $n(H+)0−n(OH−)0>0n(H+)0−n(OH−)0>0$ and so n(H+) > 0. When $n(H+)0=n(OH−)0,n(H+)0=n(OH−)0,$ the H3O+ ions from the acid and the OH ions from the base mutually neutralize. At this point, the only hydronium ions left are those from the autoionization of water, and there are no OH particles to neutralize them. Therefore, in this case:

$[H3O+]=[OH−],[H3O+]=Kw=1.0×10−14;[H3O+]=1.0×10−7[H3O+]=[OH−],[H3O+]=Kw=1.0×10−14;[H3O+]=1.0×10−7$
14.200
$pH=−log(1.0×10−7)=7.00pH=−log(1.0×10−7)=7.00$
14.201

Finally, when $n(OH−)0>n(H+)0,n(OH−)0>n(H+)0,$ there are not enough H3O+ ions to neutralize all the OH ions, and instead of $n(H+)=n(H+)0−n(OH−)0,n(H+)=n(H+)0−n(OH−)0,$ we calculate: $n(OH−)=n(OH−)0−n(H+)0n(OH−)=n(OH−)0−n(H+)0$

In this case:

$[OH−]=n(OH−)V=0.100M×X mL×(1 L1000 mL)−0.002500 mol(25.00 mL+X mL)(1 L1000 mL)=0.100M×X mL−0.002500 mol×(1000 mL1 L)25.00 mL+X mL[OH−]=n(OH−)V=0.100M×X mL×(1 L1000 mL)−0.002500 mol(25.00 mL+X mL)(1 L1000 mL)=0.100M×X mL−0.002500 mol×(1000 mL1 L)25.00 mL+X mL$
14.202
$pH=14−pOH=14+log([OH−])pH=14−pOH=14+log([OH−])$
14.203

Let us now consider the four specific cases presented in this problem:

(a) X = 0 mL

$[H3O+]=n(H+)V=0.002500 mol×(1000 mL1 L)25.00 mL=0.1M[H3O+]=n(H+)V=0.002500 mol×(1000 mL1 L)25.00 mL=0.1M$
14.204

pH = −log(0.100) = 1.000

(b) X = 12.50 mL

$[H3O+]=n(H+)V=0.002500 mol×(1000 mL1 L)−0.100M×12.50 mL25.00 mL+12.50 mL=0.0333M[H3O+]=n(H+)V=0.002500 mol×(1000 mL1 L)−0.100M×12.50 mL25.00 mL+12.50 mL=0.0333M$
14.205

pH = −log(0.0333) = 1.477

(c) X = 25.00 mL

Since the volumes and concentrations of the acid and base solutions are the same: $n(H+)0=n(OH−)0,n(H+)0=n(OH−)0,$ and pH = 7.000, as described earlier.

(d) X = 37.50 mL

In this case:

$n(OH−)0>n(H+)0n(OH−)0>n(H+)0$
14.206
$[OH−]=n(OH−)V=0.100M×35.70 mL−0.002500 mol×(1000 mL1 L)25.00 mL+37.50 mL=0.0200M[OH−]=n(OH−)V=0.100M×35.70 mL−0.002500 mol×(1000 mL1 L)25.00 mL+37.50 mL=0.0200M$
14.207

pH = 14 − pOH = 14 + log([OH]) = 14 + log(0.0200) = 12.30

Calculate the pH for the strong acid/strong base titration between 50.0 mL of 0.100 M HNO3(aq) and 0.200 M NaOH (titrant) at the listed volumes of added base: 0.00 mL, 15.0 mL, 25.0 mL, and 40.0 mL.

0.00: 1.000; 15.0: 1.5111; 25.0: 7; 40.0: 12.523

In the example, we calculated pH at four points during a titration. Table 14.4 shows a detailed sequence of changes in the pH of a strong acid and a weak acid in a titration with NaOH.

pH Values in the Titrations of a Strong Acid with a Strong Base and of a Weak Acid with a Strong Base
Volume of 0.100 M NaOH Added (mL) Moles of NaOH Added pH Values 0.100 M HCl1 pH Values 0.100 M CH3CO2H2
0.0 0.0 1.00 2.87
5.0 0.00050 1.18 4.14
10.0 0.00100 1.37 4.57
15.0 0.00150 1.60 4.92
20.0 0.00200 1.95 5.35
22.0 0.00220 2.20 5.61
24.0 0.00240 2.69 6.13
24.5 0.00245 3.00 6.44
24.9 0.00249 3.70 7.14
25.0 0.00250 7.00 8.72
25.1 0.00251 10.30 10.30
25.5 0.00255 11.00 11.00
26.0 0.00260 11.29 11.29
28.0 0.00280 11.75 11.75
30.0 0.00300 11.96 11.96
35.0 0.00350 12.22 12.22
40.0 0.00400 12.36 12.36
45.0 0.00450 12.46 12.46
50.0 0.00500 12.52 12.52
Table 14.4

The simplest acid-base reactions are those of a strong acid with a strong base. Table 14.4 shows data for the titration of a 25.0-mL sample of 0.100 M hydrochloric acid with 0.100 M sodium hydroxide. The values of the pH measured after successive additions of small amounts of NaOH are listed in the first column of this table, and are graphed in Figure 14.21, in a form that is called a titration curve. The pH increases slowly at first, increases rapidly in the middle portion of the curve, and then increases slowly again. The point of inflection (located at the midpoint of the vertical part of the curve) is observed when the amount of base added is equivalent to the amount of acid in the sample according to the stoichiometry of the titration reaction. The volume of titrant containing this stoichiometric amount of base is called the equivalence point for the titration (see the earlier chapter on stoichiometry). For the titration of a strong acid with a strong base, the equivalence point occurs at a pH of 7.00 and the points on the titration curve can be calculated using solution stoichiometry (Table 14.4 and Figure 14.21).

Figure 14.21 (a) The titration curve for the titration of 25.00 mL of 0.100 M HCl (strong acid) with 0.100 M NaOH (strong base) has an equivalence point of 7.00 pH. (b) The titration curve for the titration of 25.00 mL of 0.100 M acetic acid (weak acid) with 0.100 M NaOH (strong base) has an equivalence point of 8.72 pH.

The titration of a weak acid with a strong base (or of a weak base with a strong acid) is somewhat more complicated than that just discussed, but it follows the same general principles. Let us consider the titration of 25.0 mL of 0.100 M acetic acid (a weak acid) with 0.100 M sodium hydroxide and compare the titration curve with that of the strong acid. Table 14.4 gives the pH values during the titration, Figure 14.21 shows the titration curve.

Although the initial volume and molarity of the acids are the same, there are important differences between the two titration curves. The titration curve for the weak acid begins at a higher value (less acidic) and maintains higher pH values up to the equivalence point. This is because acetic acid is a weak acid, which is only partially ionized. The pH at the equivalence point is also higher (8.72 rather than 7.00) due to the hydrolysis of acetate, a weak base that raises the pH:

$CH3CO2−(aq)+H2O(l)⇌CH3CO2H(l)+OH−(aq)CH3CO2−(aq)+H2O(l)⇌CH3CO2H(l)+OH−(aq)$
14.208

After the equivalence point, the two curves are identical because the pH is dependent on the excess of hydroxide ion in both cases.

### Example 14.22

#### Titration of a Weak Acid with a Strong Base

The titration curve shown in Figure 14.23 is for the titration of 25.00 mL of 0.100 M CH3CO2H with 0.100 M NaOH. The reaction can be represented as:
$CH3CO2H+OH−⟶CH3CO2−+H2OCH3CO2H+OH−⟶CH3CO2−+H2O$
14.209

(a) What is the initial pH before any amount of the NaOH solution has been added? Ka = 1.8 $××$ 10−5 for CH3CO2H.

(b) Find the pH after 25.00 mL of the NaOH solution have been added.

(c) Find the pH after 12.50 mL of the NaOH solution has been added.

(d) Find the pH after 37.50 mL of the NaOH solution has been added.

#### Solution

(a) Assuming that the dissociated amount is small compared to 0.100 M, we find that:

$Ka=[H3O+][CH3CO2−][CH3CO2H]≈[H3O+]2[CH3CO2H]0,Ka=[H3O+][CH3CO2−][CH3CO2H]≈[H3O+]2[CH3CO2H]0,$ and $[H3O+]=Ka×[CH3CO2H]=1.8×10−5×0.100=1.3×10−3[H3O+]=Ka×[CH3CO2H]=1.8×10−5×0.100=1.3×10−3$

$pH=−log(1.3×10−3)=2.87pH=−log(1.3×10−3)=2.87$
14.210

(b) After 25.00 mL of NaOH are added, the number of moles of NaOH and CH3CO2H are equal because the amounts of the solutions and their concentrations are the same. All of the CH3CO2H has been converted to $CH3CO2−.CH3CO2−.$ The concentration of the $CH3CO2−CH3CO2−$ ion is:

$0.00250 mol0.0500 L=0.0500 MCH3CO2−0.00250 mol0.0500 L=0.0500 MCH3CO2−$
14.211

The equilibrium that must be focused on now is the basicity equilibrium for $CH3CO2−:CH3CO2−:$

$CH3CO2−(aq)+H2O(l)⇌CH3CO2H(aq)+OH−(aq)CH3CO2−(aq)+H2O(l)⇌CH3CO2H(aq)+OH−(aq)$
14.212

so we must determine Kb for the base by using the ion product constant for water:

$Kb=[CH3CO2H][OH−][CH3CO2−]Kb=[CH3CO2H][OH−][CH3CO2−]$
14.213
$Ka=[CH3CO2−][H+][CH3CO2H],so[CH3CO2H][CH3CO2−]=[H+]Ka.Ka=[CH3CO2−][H+][CH3CO2H],so[CH3CO2H][CH3CO2−]=[H+]Ka.$
14.214

Since Kw = [H+][OH]:

$Kb=[H+][OH−]Ka=KwKa=1.0×10−141.8×10−5=5.6×10−10Kb=[H+][OH−]Ka=KwKa=1.0×10−141.8×10−5=5.6×10−10$
14.215

Let us denote the concentration of each of the products of this reaction, CH3CO2H and OH, as x. Using the assumption that x is small compared to 0.0500 M, $Kb=x20.0500M,Kb=x20.0500M,$ and then:

$x=[OH−]=5.3×10−6x=[OH−]=5.3×10−6$
14.216
$pOH=−log(5.3×10−6)=5.28pOH=−log(5.3×10−6)=5.28$
14.217
$pH=14.00−5.28=8.72pH=14.00−5.28=8.72$
14.218

Note that the pH at the equivalence point of this titration is significantly greater than 7.

(c) In (b), 25.00 mL of the NaOH solution was added, and so practically all the CH3CO2H was converted into $CH3CO2−.CH3CO2−.$ In this case, only 12.50 mL of the base solution has been introduced, and so only half of all the CH3CO2H is converted into $CH3CO2−.CH3CO2−.$ The total initial number of moles of CH3CO2H is 0.02500L $××$ 0.100 M = 0.00250 mol, and so after adding the NaOH, the numbers of moles of CH3CO2H and $CH3CO2−CH3CO2−$ are both approximately equal to $0.00250 mol2=0.00125 mol,0.00250 mol2=0.00125 mol,$ and their concentrations are the same.

Since the amount of the added base is smaller than the original amount of the acid, the equivalence point has not been reached, the solution remains a buffer, and we can use the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation:

$pH=pKa+log[Base][Acid]=−log(Ka)+log[CH3CO2−][CH3CO2H]=−log(1.8×10−5)+log(1)pH=pKa+log[Base][Acid]=−log(Ka)+log[CH3CO2−][CH3CO2H]=−log(1.8×10−5)+log(1)$
14.219

(as the concentrations of $CH3CO2−CH3CO2−$ and CH3CO2H are the same)

Thus:

$pH=−log(1.8×10−5)=4.74pH=−log(1.8×10−5)=4.74$
14.220

(the pH = the pKa at the halfway point in a titration of a weak acid)

(d) After 37.50 mL of NaOH is added, the amount of NaOH is 0.03750 L $××$ 0.100 M = 0.003750 mol NaOH. Since this is past the equivalence point, the excess hydroxide ions will make the solution basic, and we can again use stoichiometric calculations to determine the pH:

$[OH−]=(0.003750 mol−0.00250 mol)0.06250 L=2.00×10−2M[OH−]=(0.003750 mol−0.00250 mol)0.06250 L=2.00×10−2M$
14.221

So:

$pOH=−log(2.00×10−2)=1.70, and pH=14.00−1.70=12.30pOH=−log(2.00×10−2)=1.70, and pH=14.00−1.70=12.30$
14.222

Note that this result is the same as for the strong acid-strong base titration example provided, since the amount of the strong base added moves the solution past the equivalence point.

Calculate the pH for the weak acid/strong base titration between 50.0 mL of 0.100 M HCOOH(aq) (formic acid) and 0.200 M NaOH (titrant) at the listed volumes of added base: 0.00 mL, 15.0 mL, 25.0 mL, and 30.0 mL.

0.00 mL: 2.37; 15.0 mL: 3.92; 25.00 mL: 8.29; 30.0 mL: 12.097

### Acid-Base Indicators

Certain organic substances change color in dilute solution when the hydronium ion concentration reaches a particular value. For example, phenolphthalein is a colorless substance in any aqueous solution with a hydronium ion concentration greater than 5.0 $××$ 10−9 M (pH < 8.3). In more basic solutions where the hydronium ion concentration is less than 5.0 $××$ 10−9 M (pH > 8.3), it is red or pink. Substances such as phenolphthalein, which can be used to determine the pH of a solution, are called acid-base indicators. Acid-base indicators are either weak organic acids or weak organic bases.

The equilibrium in a solution of the acid-base indicator methyl orange, a weak acid, can be represented by an equation in which we use HIn as a simple representation for the complex methyl orange molecule:

$HIn(aq)+H2O(l)⇌H3O+(aq)+In−(aq)redyellowHIn(aq)+H2O(l)⇌H3O+(aq)+In−(aq)redyellow$
14.223
$Ka=[H3O+][In−][HIn]=4.0×10−4Ka=[H3O+][In−][HIn]=4.0×10−4$
14.224

The anion of methyl orange, In, is yellow, and the nonionized form, HIn, is red. When we add acid to a solution of methyl orange, the increased hydronium ion concentration shifts the equilibrium toward the nonionized red form, in accordance with Le Châtelier’s principle. If we add base, we shift the equilibrium towards the yellow form. This behavior is completely analogous to the action of buffers.

An indicator’s color is the visible result of the ratio of the concentrations of the two species In and HIn. If most of the indicator (typically about 60−90% or more) is present as In, then we see the color of the In ion, which would be yellow for methyl orange. If most is present as HIn, then we see the color of the HIn molecule: red for methyl orange. For methyl orange, we can rearrange the equation for Ka and write:

$[In−][HIn]=[substance with yellow color][substance with red color]=Ka[H3O+][In−][HIn]=[substance with yellow color][substance with red color]=Ka[H3O+]$
14.225

This shows us how the ratio of $[In−][HIn][In−][HIn]$ varies with the concentration of hydronium ion.

The above expression describing the indicator equilibrium can be rearranged:

$[H3O+]Ka=[HIn][In−][H3O+]Ka=[HIn][In−]$
14.226
$log([H3O+]Ka)=log([HIn][In−])log([H3O+]Ka)=log([HIn][In−])$
14.227
$log([H3O+])−log(Ka)=−log([In−][HIn])log([H3O+])−log(Ka)=−log([In−][HIn])$
14.228
$−pH+pKa=−log([In−][HIn])−pH+pKa=−log([In−][HIn])$
14.229
$pH=pKa+log([In−][HIn])orpH=pKa+log([base][acid])pH=pKa+log([In−][HIn])orpH=pKa+log([base][acid])$
14.230

The last formula is the same as the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, which can be used to describe the equilibrium of indicators.

When [H3O+] has the same numerical value as Ka, the ratio of [In] to [HIn] is equal to 1, meaning that 50% of the indicator is present in the red form (HIn) and 50% is in the yellow ionic form (In), and the solution appears orange in color. When the hydronium ion concentration increases to 8 $××$ 10−4 M (a pH of 3.1), the solution turns red. No change in color is visible for any further increase in the hydronium ion concentration (decrease in pH). At a hydronium ion concentration of 4 $××$ 10−5 M (a pH of 4.4), most of the indicator is in the yellow ionic form, and a further decrease in the hydronium ion concentration (increase in pH) does not produce a visible color change. The pH range between 3.1 (red) and 4.4 (yellow) is the color-change interval of methyl orange; the pronounced color change takes place between these pH values.

There are many different acid-base indicators that cover a wide range of pH values and can be used to determine the approximate pH of an unknown solution by a process of elimination. Universal indicators and pH paper contain a mixture of indicators and exhibit different colors at different pHs. Figure 14.22 presents several indicators, their colors, and their color-change intervals.

Figure 14.22 This chart illustrates the ranges of color change for several acid-base indicators.

Titration curves help us pick an indicator that will provide a sharp color change at the equivalence point. The best selection would be an indicator that has a color change interval that brackets the pH at the equivalence point of the titration.

Color change pH intervals for three different acid-base indicators are shown in Figure 14.23. Since the phenolphthalein color change interval occurs within the near-vertical portions of both titrations curves, this indicator may be used to signal the end point in both strong and weak acid titrations.

Figure 14.23 The graph shows a titration curve for the titration of 25.00 mL of 0.100 M CH3CO2H (weak acid) with 0.100 M NaOH (strong base) and the titration curve for the titration of HCl (strong acid) with NaOH (strong base). The pH ranges for the color change of phenolphthalein, litmus, and methyl orange are indicated by the shaded areas.

Litmus is a suitable indicator for the HCl titration because its color change brackets the equivalence point. However, we should not use litmus for the CH3CO2H titration because the pH is within the color-change interval of litmus when only about 12 mL of NaOH has been added, and it does not leave the range until 25 mL has been added. The color change would be very gradual, taking place during the addition of 13 mL of NaOH, making litmus useless as an indicator of the equivalence point.

We could use methyl orange for the HCl titration, but it would not give very accurate results: (1) It completes its color change slightly before the equivalence point is reached (but very close to it, so this is not too serious); (2) it changes color, as Figure 14.23 shows, during the addition of nearly 0.5 mL of NaOH, which is not so sharp a color change as that of litmus or phenolphthalein; and (3) it goes from yellow to orange to red, making detection of a precise endpoint much more challenging than the colorless to pink change of phenolphthalein. Figure 14.23 shows us that methyl orange would be completely useless as an indicator for the CH3CO2H titration. Its color change begins after about 1 mL of NaOH has been added and ends when about 8 mL has been added. The color change is completed long before the equivalence point (which occurs when 25.0 mL of NaOH has been added) is reached and hence provides no indication of the equivalence point.

We base our choice of indicator on a calculated pH, the pH at the equivalence point. At the equivalence point, equimolar amounts of acid and base have been mixed, and the calculation becomes that of the pH of a solution of the salt resulting from the titration.

### Footnotes

• 1Titration of 25.00 mL of 0.100 M HCl (0.00250 mol of HCI) with 0.100 M NaOH.
• 2Titration of 25.00 mL of 0.100 M CH3CO2H (0.00250 mol of CH3CO2H) with 0.100 M NaOH.
Order a print copy

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.