By the end of this section, you will be able to do the following:
- Describe blackbody radiation
- Define quantum states and their relationship to modern physics
- Calculate the quantum energy of lights
- Explain how photon energies vary across divisions of the electromagnetic spectrum
The learning objectives in this section will help your students master the following standards:
- (3) Scientific processes. The student uses critical thinking, scientific reasoning, and problem solving to make informed decisions within and outside the classroom. The student is expected to:
- (D): explain the impacts of the scientific contributions of a variety of historical and contemporary scientists on scientific thought and society.
- (8) Science concepts. The student knows simple examples of atomic, nuclear, and quantum phenomena. The student is expected to:
- (B): compare and explain the emission spectra produced by various atoms; and
- (D): give examples of applications of atomic and nuclear phenomena such as radiation therapy, diagnostic imaging, and nuclear power, and examples of quantum phenomena such as digital cameras.
Section Key Terms
- Prior to beginning this section, it would be a good idea to review wave concepts including frequency, wavelength, and amplitude. Have students write down a list of equations or statements that relate to the three concepts.
- [BL][OL]Discuss what could be meant by the term blackbody. Why do some objects appear black? Furthermore, why do we see objects that are red as red? It is said that black is the absence of color, but what does that mean in terms of the light reflected into our eyes?
- [AL]Discuss what can happen to energy when it strikes a surface. Discuss how it can be reflected or transmitted. If a blackbody is perfectly black, what must be happening to all of the energy incident upon it?
- [EL]Reinforce that the term blackbody is nothing more than its name suggests—that is, a body that is perfectly black. Discuss what perfectly black means. Is a black piece of paper perfectly black?
Our first story of curious significance begins with a T-shirt. You are likely aware that wearing a tight black T-shirt outside on a hot day provides a significantly less comfortable experience than wearing a white shirt. Black shirts, as well as all other black objects, will absorb and re-emit a significantly greater amount of radiation from the sun. This shirt is a good approximation of what is called a blackbody.
Occasionally, texts refer to blackbody and perfect blackbody as two different concepts. It is likely best to refer to anything that is not a perfect blackbody as an approximation of a blackbody in order to avoid confusion.
A perfect blackbody is one that absorbs and re-emits all radiated energy that is incident upon it. Imagine wearing a tight shirt that did this! This phenomenon is often modeled with quite a different scenario. Imagine carving a small hole in an oven that can be heated to very high temperatures. As the temperature of this container gets hotter and hotter, the radiation out of this dark hole would increase as well, re-emitting all energy provided it by the increased temperature. The hole may even begin to glow in different colors as the temperature is increased. Like a burner on your stove, the hole would glow red, then orange, then blue, as the temperature is increased. In time, the hole would continue to glow but the light would be invisible to our eyes. This container is a good model of a perfect blackbody.
It is the analysis of blackbodies that led to one of the most consequential discoveries of the twentieth century. Take a moment to carefully examine Figure 21.2. What relationships exist? What trends can you see? The more time you spend interpreting this figure, the closer you will be to understanding quantum physics!
It is important for students to make sense of Figure 21.2 before progressing further. Have students independently create a list of observations from the graph. When presenting their observations, press the students on the specifics of their observations.
[BL]Discuss what variables are being graphed. Have them complete the statement: ________ is dependent upon ________. Discuss what is meant by intensity. What is the difference between being mad and intensely mad?
[OL]Discuss what the peak of each graph refers to. Ask if the radiation intensity depends upon the wavelength of the radiation. How do they know this? What do the peaks on each graph mean?
[AL]Discuss why there are three lines on the graph. Does it make sense that an increase in temperature would cause the line of the graph to be raised? Why does this make sense? A good challenging exercise would be to have the students re-graph the information in order to represent EM radiation intensity against frequency.
When encountering a new graph, it is best to try to interpret the graph before you read about it. Doing this will make the following text more meaningful and will help to remind yourself of some of the key concepts within the section.
Understanding Blackbody Graphs
Figure 21.2 is a plot of radiation intensity against radiated wavelength. In other words, it shows how the intensity of radiated light changes when a blackbody is heated to a particular temperature.
It may help to just follow the bottom-most red line labeled 3,000 K, red hot. The graph shows that when a blackbody acquires a temperature of 3,000 K, it radiates energy across the electromagnetic spectrum. However, the energy is most intensely emitted at a wavelength of approximately 1000 nm. This is in the infrared portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. While a body at this temperature would appear red-hot to our eyes, it would truly appear ‘infrared-hot’ if we were able to see the entire spectrum.
A few other important notes regarding Figure 21.2:
- As temperature increases, the total amount of energy radiated increases. This is shown by examining the area underneath each line.
- Regardless of temperature, all red lines on the graph undergo a consistent pattern. While electromagnetic radiation is emitted throughout the spectrum, the intensity of this radiation peaks at one particular wavelength.
- As the temperature changes, the wavelength of greatest radiation intensity changes. At 4,000 K, the radiation is most intense in the yellow-green portion of the spectrum. At 6,000 K, the blackbody would radiate white hot, due to intense radiation throughout the visible portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. Remember that white light is the emission of all visible colors simultaneously.
- As the temperature increases, the frequency of light providing the greatest intensity increases as well. Recall the equation Because the speed of light is constant, frequency and wavelength are inversely related. This is verified by the leftward movement of the three red lines as temperature is increased.
Discuss the bullet points above. Why does an increase in temperature result in an increase in the total amount of energy radiated? Do you have personal experience with the relationship described in bullet point #3? Students may not have answers as to the causal factors for some of the observations in the above bullet points. Remind them that this is okay as these why questions were the big questions being asked by physicists at the turn of the twentieth century!
[BL][OL]Do you have personal evidence to show that as temperature increases the energy radiated increases as well?
[AL]Remind students that temperature is just a measure of the average kinetic energy of particles in a gas. Does this definition support bullet point #1?
While in science it is important to categorize observations, theorizing as to why the observations exist is crucial to scientific advancement. Why doesn’t a blackbody emit radiation evenly across all wavelengths? Why does the temperature of the body change the peak wavelength that is radiated? Why does an increase in temperature cause the peak wavelength emitted to decrease? It is questions like these that drove significant research at the turn of the twentieth century. And within the context of these questions, Max Planck discovered something of tremendous importance.
Planck’s revolution is very much the story of the scientific method—reconciling disconnects between theory and experimental results. Encourage the students to think of other events—either historical or within their own lives—in which a predominant theory was shown to be incorrect when confronted with overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Possible examples include the geocentric model, the ether, or the four elements.
The prevailing theory at the time of Max Planck’s discovery was that intensity and frequency were related by the equation This equation, derived from classical physics and using wave phenomena, infers that as wavelength increases, the intensity of energy provided will decrease with an inverse-squared relationship. This relationship is graphed in Figure 21.3 and shows a troubling trend. For starters, it should be apparent that the graph from this equation does not match the blackbody graphs found experimentally. Additionally, it shows that for an object of any temperature, there should be an infinite amount of energy quickly emitted in the shortest wavelengths. When theory and experimental results clash, it is important to re-evaluate both models. The disconnect between theory and reality was termed the ultraviolet catastrophe.
Due to concerns over the ultraviolet catastrophe, Max Planck began to question whether another factor impacted the relationship between intensity and wavelength. This factor, he posited, should affect the probability that short wavelength light would be emitted. Should this factor reduce the probability of short wavelength light, it would cause the radiance curve to not progress infinitely as in the classical theory, but would instead cause the curve to precipitate back downward as is shown in the 5,000 K, 4,000 K, and 3,000 K temperature lines of the graph in Figure 21.3. Planck noted that this factor, whatever it may be, must also be dependent on temperature, as the intensity decreases at lower and lower wavelengths as the temperature increases.
The determination of this probability factor was a groundbreaking discovery in physics, yielding insight not just into light but also into energy and matter itself. It would be the basis for Planck’s 1918 Nobel Prize in Physics and would result in the transition of physics from classical to modern understanding. In an attempt to determine the cause of the probability factor, Max Planck constructed a new theory. This theory, which created the branch of physics called quantum mechanics, speculated that the energy radiated by the blackbody could exist only in specific numerical, or quantum, states. This theory is described by the equation where n is any nonnegative integer (0, 1, 2, 3, …) and h is Planck’s constant, given by and f is frequency.
Through this equation, Planck’s probability factor can be more clearly understood. Each frequency of light provides a specific quantized amount of energy. Low frequency light, associated with longer wavelengths would provide a smaller amount of energy, while high frequency light, associated with shorter wavelengths, would provide a larger amount of energy. For specified temperatures with specific total energies, it makes sense that more low frequency light would be radiated than high frequency light. To a degree, the relationship is like pouring coins through a funnel. More of the smaller pennies would be able to pass through the funnel than the larger quarters. In other words, because the value of the coin is somewhat related to the size of the coin, the probability of a quarter passing through the funnel is reduced!
Furthermore, an increase in temperature would signify the presence of higher energy. As a result, the greater amount of total blackbody energy would allow for more of the high frequency, short wavelength, energies to be radiated. This permits the peak of the blackbody curve to drift leftward as the temperature increases, as it does from the 3,000 K to 4,000 K to 5,000 K values. Furthering our coin analogy, consider a wider funnel. This funnel would permit more quarters to pass through and allow for a reduction in concern about the probability factor.
In summary, it is the interplay between the predicted classical model and the quantum probability that creates the curve depicted in Figure 21.3. Just as quarters have a higher currency denomination than pennies, higher frequencies come with larger amounts of energy. However, just as the probability of a quarter passing through a fixed diameter funnel is reduced, so is the probability of a high frequency light existing in a fixed temperature object. As is often the case in physics, it is the balancing of multiple incredible ideas that finally allows for better understanding.
[EL]Quantum is related to the word quantity, a measure of the amount of something. Discuss why the term quantum would be useful in this context.
[BL, OL, AL]Quantum vs. continuous states is well described when considering clocks. A digital clock represents quantum states—it reads 11:14 a.m., then 11:15 a.m. An analog clock with a continually gliding second hand is a good representation of continuous states—it does not appear to pause at any one instant. What would you consider an analog clock that ticks each second? What would you consider a grandfather clock?
It may be helpful at this point to further consider the idea of quantum states. Atoms, molecules, and fundamental electron and proton charges are all examples of physical entities that are quantized—that is, they appear only in certain discrete values and do not have every conceivable value. On the macroscopic scale, this is not a revolutionary concept. A standing wave on a string allows only particular harmonics described by integers. Going up and down a hill using discrete stair steps causes your potential energy to take on discrete values as you move from step to step. Furthermore, we cannot have a fraction of an atom, or part of an electron’s charge, or 14.33 cents. Rather, everything is built of integral multiples of these substructures.
That said, to discover quantum states within a phenomenon that science had always considered continuous would certainly be surprising. When Max Planck was able to use quantization to correctly describe the experimentally known shape of the blackbody spectrum, it was the first indication that energy was quantized on a small scale as well. This discovery earned Planck the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1918 and was such a revolutionary departure from classical physics that Planck himself was reluctant to accept his own idea. The general acceptance of Planck’s energy quantization was greatly enhanced by Einstein’s explanation of the photoelectric effect (discussed in the next section), which took energy quantization a step further.
How Many Photons per Second Does a Typical Light Bulb Produce?
Assuming that 10 percent of a 100-W light bulb’s energy output is in the visible range (typical for incandescent bulbs) with an average wavelength of 580 nm, calculate the number of visible photons emitted per second.
The number of visible photons per second is directly related to the amount of energy emitted each second, also known as the bulb’s power. By determining the bulb’s power, the energy emitted each second can be found. Since the power is given in watts, which is joules per second, the energy will be in joules. By comparing this to the amount of energy associated with each photon, the number of photons emitted each second can be determined.
The power in visible light production is 10.0 percent of 100 W, or 10.0 J/s. The energy of the average visible photon is found by substituting the given average wavelength into the formula
By rearranging the above formula to determine energy per photon, this produces
The number of visible photons per second is thus
This incredible number of photons per second is verification that individual photons are insignificant in ordinary human experience. However, it is also a verification of our everyday experience—on the macroscopic scale, photons are so small that quantization becomes essentially continuous.
How does Photon Energy Change with Various Portions of the EM Spectrum?
Refer to the Graphs of Blackbody Radiation shown in the first figure in this section. Compare the energy necessary to radiate one photon of infrared light and one photon of visible light.
To determine the energy radiated, it is necessary to use the equation It is also necessary to find a representative frequency for infrared light and visible light.
According to the first figure in this section, one representative wavelength for infrared light is 2000 nm (2.000 × 10-6 m). The associated frequency of an infrared light is
Using the equation , the energy associated with one photon of representative infrared light is
The same process above can be used to determine the energy associated with one photon of representative visible light. According to the first figure in this section, one representative wavelength for visible light is 500 nm.
This example verifies that as the wavelength of light decreases, the quantum energy increases. This explains why a fire burning with a blue flame is considered more dangerous than a fire with a red flame. Each photon of short-wavelength blue light emitted carries a greater amount of energy than a long-wavelength red light. This example also helps explain the differences in the 3,000 K, 4,000 K, and 6,000 K lines shown in the first figure in this section. As the temperature is increased, more energy is available for a greater number of short-wavelength photons to be emitted.
An AM radio station broadcasts at a frequency of 1,530 kHz . What is the energy in Joules of a photon emitted from this station?
- 10.1 × 10-26 J
- 1.01 × 10-28 J
- 1.01 × 10-29 J
- 1.01 × 10-27 J
A photon travels with energy of 1.0 eV. What type of EM radiation is this photon?
- visible radiation
- microwave radiation
- infrared radiation
- ultraviolet radiation
Check Your Understanding
Do reflective or absorptive surfaces more closely model a perfect blackbody?
- reflective surfaces
- absorptive surfaces
Why do we not notice quantization of photons in everyday experience?
- because the size of each photon is very large
- because the mass of each photon is so small
- because the energy provided by photons is very large
- because the energy provided by photons is very small