Learning Outcomes
By the end of this section, you should be able to:
- 17.4.1 Evaluate a nutritional plan for its effect on gastrointestinal wellness.
- 17.4.2 Modify a nutritional plan to promote gastrointestinal wellness.
Evaluation of the Client’s Adherence to the Meal Plan
After a nutritional plan has been in place for at least 3 months, its effectiveness should be evaluated. The client’s ability to follow the plan must first be established before the plan is modified. If a client is not able to follow the plan as prescribed, then changes need to be made based on the client’s unique reasons for nonadherence.
Unfolding Case Study
Part B
Read the following clinical scenario and then answer the questions that follow. This case study is a follow-up to Case Study Part A.
Mrs. Azan returns to the clinic several months later after meeting with the registered dietician to make dietary modifications. She has been taking her prescribed supplements. Although her previous signs and symptoms have resolved, she is now presenting with unplanned weight loss; pallor; dry, brittle nails; hair loss; edema in the legs; and muscle weakness.
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Nutritional Plan
After it is established that the client is adhering to their nutritional plan, evaluating the effectiveness of the plan requires checking laboratory results and watching trends as well as performing physical reassessments. If the plan is not effective, adjustments should be made based on the cause of ineffectiveness.
Unfolding Case Study
Part C
Read the following clinical scenario and then answer the questions that follow. This case study is a follow-up to Case Study Parts A and B.
Mrs. Azan has returned for her follow-up appointment. It has been 3 months since her last visit. Blood levels were redrawn a week ago, and the results show that vitamin B12, magnesium, and potassium have stabilized to a low normal range, but iron is still very low. The laboratory tests ordered also show that Mrs. Azan’s calcium and vitamin D levels are low now despite being normal previously. The 72-hour recall the client reports is consistent with the nutritional goals and education given, and she says she has been following the plan closely. Her food choices are diverse enough to ensure that the calcium and vitamin D levels should not have decreased.