Skip to ContentGo to accessibility pageKeyboard shortcuts menu
OpenStax Logo
Medical-Surgical Nursing

4.5 Evaluating Outcomes

Medical-Surgical Nursing4.5 Evaluating Outcomes

Learning Objectives

By the end of this section, you will be able to:

  • Evaluate nursing actions to determine if they were effective in achieving patient outcomes
  • Describe how to modify nursing plans of care to more effectively achieve optimal patient outcomes

Imagine you have set a goal for yourself: to run a marathon. It is a challenging objective, requiring not just determination but also a strategic plan. Your plan will likely include a detailed training schedule, a balanced diet, and regular health checkups to monitor your fitness levels. However, creating this plan is just the beginning. The next crucial step is implementation: putting your plan into action. This means adhering to your training schedule, running regularly, gradually increasing your distance, eating according to your diet plan, and consistently monitoring your health. Each of these actions is a step toward your goal, bringing you closer to being marathon-ready.

Yet, the process does not end with implementation. The final phase is possibly even more important. Despite your best efforts, suppose that on the day of the marathon you are unable to complete the 26.2 mi (42.2 km). This is where you need to evaluate your plan by analyzing what went wrong and identifying areas for improvement. Did you train sufficiently? Were there nutritional gaps in your diet? Did you give your body enough time to recover between training sessions? Addressing these questions will help you understand the shortcomings of your initial plan and make necessary adjustments for your next attempt.

This process of planning, implementing, and evaluating is not just relevant for personal goals such as running a marathon. It is also a fundamental approach in various fields, including nursing. Nurses plan and implement care plans and then evaluate outcomes, ensuring that patient care is continuously improved and adapted to achieve the best possible outcomes.

Evaluating Outcomes

The systematic determination of a patient's progress toward the achievement of outcomes and goals set during the care-planning process is called evaluation. Looking at the CJMM, the evaluation phase follows the phase of taking action, marking the final step. Evaluation is a dynamic and ongoing activity in which nurses assess whether the patient's health status is improving, staying the same, or perhaps worsening in response to the nursing interventions. This phase is crucial as it determines the effectiveness of the nursing care provided, informs necessary changes to the care plan, and ensures that the patient's health needs are being met adequately (American Nurses Association, n.d.).

Let us revisit Mr. Silva, whose case we have been following throughout the implementation phase following his knee replacement surgery. The nursing team has diligently executed the planned interventions for Mr. Silva’s postoperative care, including managing his pain, assisting with mobility exercises, and educating him about his condition. As we enter the evaluation phase, it is time to critically assess the outcomes of these interventions. Did they improve Mr. Silva's condition as expected? Are there any aspects of the care that need adjusting? This module will guide us through the systematic approach to evaluating Mr. Silva's progress, employing the essential tools and criteria nurses use to analyze and measure the effectiveness of the care provided (Cleveland Clinic, 2023).

Determine Patient Progress

In the evaluation phase, determining the patient's progress is a fundamental step. For Mr. Silva, who has been recovering from knee surgery, this involves a comprehensive review of his current health status compared to the expected outcomes outlined in his care plan. The nursing team assesses various factors, such as the reduction in pain levels, improvement in mobility, and adherence to postoperative instructions. This step is crucial as it provides an insight into the effectiveness of the interventions and whether Mr. Silva is on track with his recovery. This step is not only about noting improvements but also identifying any areas where progress might be lagging or any complications that may have arisen.

Analyze Current Data

Nurses are continually obtaining and analyzing data from their patients, and the evaluation phase is no different (Lukey, 2023). To analyze Mr. Silva's current data, the nursing team reviews his medical records since the start of the implementation phase, including vital signs, pain assessment scores, and progress in physical therapy sessions. These objective data provide measurable, observable evidence of Mr. Silva’s recovery progress. For instance, a decrease in pain scores and an increase in the range of motion in his knee indicate positive responses to pain management strategies and physiotherapy.

Furthermore, the team considers subjective data, such as Mr. Silva’s own reports of pain and his feelings about the progress he is making. This type of information is crucial as it provides a holistic view of the patient's experience and recovery. The team also evaluates the effectiveness of patient education by assessing Mr. Silva’s understanding of and adherence to postoperative care instructions, such as medication schedules and exercise routines. This comprehensive analysis helps the nursing team make informed decisions about any necessary adjustments to the care plan, ensuring it remains aligned with Mr. Silva's health needs and recovery goals.

Modifying Nursing Care Plans

After determining patient progress and analyzing current data, the nursing team should have a good idea about whether patient goals were met. This information is essential for guiding the next steps in patient care, whether the team continues with successful strategies or reevaluates and modifies the care plan to address challenges. This modification is based on the conclusions drawn from the evaluation data and can take several forms, depending on the patient’s progress and current needs. For Mr. Silva, who is recovering from knee surgery, the nursing team faces decisions on whether to continue, revise, or terminate certain aspects of his care plan, depending on his recovery status and response to the interventions.

If the nursing team concludes that Mr. Silva is progressing well and meeting the recovery goals as expected, the decision may be to continue with the current plan. For instance, if Mr. Silva’s pain levels are well-managed and he is showing steady improvement in mobility, the existing pain management strategies and physical therapy exercises would be continued. Continuing a care plan is appropriate when the patient is responding positively to the interventions and the goals are being progressively met.

Should the evaluation reveal that Mr. Silva’s recovery is not progressing as anticipated, or if he encounters new challenges, the nursing team may decide to revise the care plan. This could involve altering his pain management regimen if his pain is not adequately controlled or introducing different physical therapy techniques if his mobility is not improving as expected. Revising a care plan is necessary when the current interventions are not fully effective or when the patient’s condition changes.

Real RN Stories

Nurse: Junot, RN, BSN
Years in Practice: Six
Clinical Setting: Community health clinic
Geographic Location: San Diego, California

In my six years as a registered nurse, particularly in a community health setting, I’ve learned the importance of being adaptable and responsive when it comes to patient care plans. A memorable case that highlights this was with Mr. Jacobs, a 52-year-old patient with a diagnosis of high cholesterol.

Initially, we had developed a care plan focusing on lifestyle modifications: diet changes, increased physical activity, and regular health monitoring. Despite our efforts, Mr. Jacobs’s cholesterol levels remained high during subsequent checkups. This was a clear indication that our initial plan was not as effective as we had hoped.

Acknowledging this, we revised Mr. Jacobs’s care plan. We introduced a more structured diet program and added a cholesterol-lowering medication. We also involved a dietitian for more personalized dietary guidance and scheduled more frequent follow-ups to closely monitor his progress.

The revised plan showed significant improvement in Mr. Jacobs’s cholesterol levels. He became more engaged in his care, often sharing his new recipes and exercise routines with us. His dedication and our collaborative approach paid off, and over time, his cholesterol levels stabilized to a point where we could gradually reduce and eventually terminate the medication.

This experience with Mr. Jacobs reinforced for me the dynamic nature of nursing care. It highlighted the necessity of continually evaluating and adjusting our care plans, staying patient-centric in our approach, and being open to changing strategies when initial plans don’t yield the expected results. The success of this case was a testament to the power of collaboration, patient involvement, and the willingness to adapt for the betterment of patient health.

Citation/Attribution

This book may not be used in the training of large language models or otherwise be ingested into large language models or generative AI offerings without OpenStax's permission.

Want to cite, share, or modify this book? This book uses the Creative Commons Attribution License and you must attribute OpenStax.

Attribution information
  • If you are redistributing all or part of this book in a print format, then you must include on every physical page the following attribution:
    Access for free at https://openstax.org/books/medical-surgical-nursing/pages/1-introduction
  • If you are redistributing all or part of this book in a digital format, then you must include on every digital page view the following attribution:
    Access for free at https://openstax.org/books/medical-surgical-nursing/pages/1-introduction
Citation information

© Sep 20, 2024 OpenStax. Textbook content produced by OpenStax is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License . The OpenStax name, OpenStax logo, OpenStax book covers, OpenStax CNX name, and OpenStax CNX logo are not subject to the Creative Commons license and may not be reproduced without the prior and express written consent of Rice University.