Learning Objectives
By the end of this section, you will be able to:
- Identify common developmental tasks of emerging and early adulthood
- Explain the role of cultural change in the development of self during emerging and early adulthood
- Describe how personality may evolve and solidify across emerging and early adulthood
Tell me about yourself. Chad had been mulling over this question in the few days since his blind date. It’s such a simple question, but he had a hard time answering it as he attempted to figure out what, exactly, this prospective partner might find interesting to know about him. Did they want to know that he considers himself friendly, introverted, trustworthy, and hardworking? Or that he’s a total foodie, a D&D fan, and someone who hopes to learn to scuba dive someday? Who is he?
In this section, we focus on the development of self and personality in emerging and early adulthood. The self encompasses all our personal characteristics (APA, 2023.) It is the way we see ourselves, represent ourselves, and relate to others. The self is considered a broader and more complex part of our development than our personality or identity (discussed later in this chapter). We’ll also examine developmental tasks and life events at this stage and the way they shape our sense of self. Finally, we’ll consider the frameworks of Erikson and other theorists who explain why our sense of self changes as we move into adulthood, and how that change relates to our personality traits.
Developmental Tasks: Growing Independence and Role Change
Between the ages of 18 and 29, U.S. adults may experience several significant life changes, such as leaving the parental home, completing school, entering the workforce, forming a committed romantic relationship, and becoming a parent. Many if not all these events require or result in increasing independence and role change that in turn contribute to the development of self. In preparation for these tasks, developmental psychologist Jeffrey Arnett (2000) suggested that “emerging adulthood” (ages 18–25) is characterized by a period of extensive exploration of new roles and adult commitments. Young adults place more priority on personal growth-oriented opportunities that have the potential to increase their social relationships, status, and vocational success, compared to older adults who place greater priority on their health and prosocial engagement. Regardless of age, it is how attainable we perceive our goals to be that predicts our well-being (Bühler et al., 2019). Scales and colleagues (2015) assert that successful development means more than just completing a developmental task or reaching a personal goal, but also being able to develop with a “thriving orientation,” reflected by growth in a young adult’s well-being and maturity as they encounter changing roles and contexts. Based on this perspective, Scales and colleagues conducted an extensive review of cross-cultural research and identified eight dimensions of well-being that reflect a “successful young adulthood: physical health, psychological and emotional well-being, life skills, ethical behavior, healthy family and social relationships, educational attainment, constructive educational and occupational engagement, civic engagement” (Scales et al., 2015) (Figure 12.2).
Scales and colleagues intended this list to be inclusive enough to reflect developmental success in early adulthood for a variety of people, but the way we measure or interpret each dimension is filtered through our own cultural context. For example, young adults from more traditional communities or collectivistic cultures may view the pathway to developing “healthy family relationships” as living in and contributing to their parents’ household, whereas other young adults might measure it by their ability to leave the parental home and support themselves. Let’s take a closer look at the way cultural changes influence our perspective of developmental success in early adulthood.
The Social Clock and the Cultural Context of Social Development
Cultural expectations about normative behavior and achievements are often associated with age and create a social clock by which we judge the progress of ourselves and others (Neugarten et al., 1965). Social clock expectations do not necessarily reflect what is real or typical but instead are idealized milestones. For example, in the United States a widespread expectation is that college education should begin immediately after high school graduation and be completed within four years, by age 22. In reality, fewer than half of U.S. college students complete their college education within this timeframe (U.S. Department of Education, 2019).
Social clock milestones are set by a person’s culture and generation, as well as their age. Take the developmental task of leaving your parents’ home. The number of young U.S. adults who live with their parents has increased somewhat over the last 75 years, and young men are more likely to do so than young women (Hatfield, 2023), but the percentage has peaked during times of national emergency, such as during the Great Depression (48 percent) and the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 (52 percent) (Fry et al., 2020). (Figure 12.3).
Currently one-third of U.S. adults aged 18-34 live with their parents. Compare that number with recent reports from the European Union, where in many countries such as Italy, Greece, and Croatia, two-thirds of young adults live at home with their parents (Figure 12.4).
If we measure success in young adulthood by the person’s well-being in their changing roles and contexts, what happens when a young adult or others perceive them to be on or off time with their social clock? In many cultures, most developmental tasks of young adulthood are considered positive (such as graduation) (Shanahan & Busseri, 2019), and not completing them may be seen negatively.
Self-evaluation based on completion of developmental tasks in young adulthood appears to be cross-cultural. In both the culture of Turkey and the culture of Switzerland, young adults report greater life satisfaction when they achieve these goals. What differs across cultures are the developmental priorities: Life satisfaction of Turkish young adults is positively affected by on-time achievement of traditional family tasks such as marriage and parenthood, whereas Swiss young adults were more focused on individual achievements such as education and independent living (Pekel-Uludağlı & Akbaş, 2019; Krings et al., 2008). These differing priorities are echoed by interviews with diverse young adults in the United States. Those from immigrant families and ethnic and racial minorities are more likely to view the transition to adulthood as preparation for “the roles and responsibilities of interdependence,” such as living within or contributing to an intergenerational family household or business, than to prioritize individuality and independence (Swartz et al., 2017, p. 280).
Overall, today’s young adults appear to care about the traditional goals prescribed by their social clocks such as career and marriage, but they also pursue personal priorities like independence, maturity, and confidence. Those in the United States report that normative milestones like graduating and starting a career matter to them but are not prerequisites to adult maturity, and thus they can be flexible about when they complete them (Swartz et al., 2017). Based on hundreds of interviews around the country, Swartz and colleagues (2017) concluded that today’s young adults “felt fairly comfortable with the uncertainty and ambiguity – social status-wise – of the transition to adulthood. They took it as almost natural and inevitable, nearly desiring and celebrating the lack of certainty for its flexibility, freedom, and openness” (p. 4).
This generational shift in young adults’ perspective on the social clock is likely an adaptation to the rapid pace of cultural change. In addition to staying longer in their parents’ home, they are also prolonging their education, marrying later, having children later, changing jobs more frequently, and even remaining dependent on their parent’s healthcare plan longer than previous generations (Vespa, 2017; Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 2023). What accounts for these changes? Young adults are responding to the changing circumstances of the world around them that have sometimes created more opportunities but also set up more potential obstacles (Swartz et al., 2017). That said, many young adults still might feel some stress or anxiety if those in their close friend or social group seem to be achieving developmental tasks before they do. Feeling "off time" from your social group - particularly if you are behind their schedule - can create some invisible pressure to adhere to the social clock.
Opportunities and Obstacles
Today’s young adults can search for educational and employment opportunities, dating partners, and new homes without getting out of bed. They can learn, work, and maintain personal connections online. Access to education, information, and social connection has increased, and the methods by which young adults interact with their world have changed.
Young U.S. adults are also living in an increasingly diverse nation. According to the U.S. Census Diversity Index, in 2010 the chance that two randomly chosen individuals would be from different racial or ethnic groups was just over half, at 54.9 percent (U.S. Census Bureau, 2020) (Figure 12.5). By 2020 it was 61.6 percent, given greater diversity among younger than older age groups (Menchaca et al., 2023; U.S. Census Bureau, 2020). This growing diversity is reflected in the increasing variety of experiences in emerging adulthood, and it disrupts the assumptions of a one-size-fits-all social clock. However, sometimes a young person’s possible pathways are limited by economic, social, and cultural constraints, which we must also consider when navigating the shifting cultural landscape.
Economic conditions can impede young adults’ progress on developmental goals like continuing their education and living independently. Over the last 40 years, the United States and other nations have increasingly evolved into knowledge economies in which financial success depends largely on technological skill and innovation, scientific knowledge and progress, and intellectual breakthroughs (Berkes & Gaetani, 2023). The industries that accomplish these tasks rely on a more highly educated workforce. Not surprisingly, then, 74 percent of the high school class of 2023 reported they wanted to go to college (Bauer-Wolf, 2023). However, only 66 percent expect to attend, and in many states like Arizona, Idaho, and Utah, the percentage that enroll is 50 percent or lower (NCHEMS, 2018). Many cite cost as a major barrier. Even when adjusting for inflation, the average cost of attending a 4-year college has increased 180 percent in the last 40 years (McGurran & Hahn, 2023). Higher education isn’t the only avenue to independence with financial barriers: With sky-rocketing home prices, interest rates, and utility costs, a recent report concluded that housing hasn’t been so unaffordable in the United States since 1984 (Bahney, 2023).
Robbins and Wilner (2001) coined the term quarter-life crisis to describe feelings of helplessness, panic, indecision, and apprehension that may accompany the expectations of emerging adulthood. In a meta-analysis of research published over the last ten years, Hasyim and colleagues (2024) identified both individual and environmental factors that may influence whether a young adult experiences these feelings (Figure 12.6). Inflexibly committing to goals without space for reflection can make young people feel trapped and anxious. This anxiety can be lowered by perceived social support and spirituality. However, when young adults perceived their family or community as exerting too much influence, pressure, or judgment, it increased the likelihood of negative experiences during the early adult transition, particularly for adults from families with collectivistic cultural values.
Faced with so many challenges and choices, however, young adults are particularly good at adaptive decision-making. They can efficiently review and integrate information in task-specific ways (Lindow & Lang, 2022). Perhaps that is why, contrary to the looming threat of the quarter-life crisis, reported life satisfaction typically increases for most over the course of young adulthood (Switek & Easterlin, 2018). Even when he used the term crisis within his own work, Erikson did not mean “impending catastrophe” but rather “a necessary turning point” (Erikson, 1968, p. 16). And consistent with the research, relationships with others are important to developmental success during that turning point in time.
Life Hacks
Thriving During the Quarter-Life Crisis
Looking back, young adults who have been through the “quarter-life crisis” provide the following advice (Dabis & Yates, 2014):
- Change your environment. Even a temporary change in surroundings like a visit home or a short vacation can provide space to reset and reflect.
- Practice self-awareness. Workplace psychologists call this process “taking stock” (Panchal & Jackson, 2007). Take time to review your situation. Pay attention when something doesn’t feel right and consider how to leverage your strengths.
- Be decisive. Have confidence in your feelings and follow through with your decisions. Practicing self-assurance doesn’t mean staying committed to bad situations, but rather following your gut. And sometimes that means changing what you are doing.
- Stay positive. Tell yourself it will be okay. Let go of your own negative thoughts, challenge the negative voices of others, and reject toxic environments.
- Practice resilience. Few things in life go as planned. Get comfortable with a little trial and error. Be prepared to “tweak” and “adapt” as you go.
- Think about your finances. While money doesn’t buy happiness, it does provide stability. Spend carefully, save what you can, and think long-term.
- Find support. Friends, family, coworkers, and community members in whom you can confide and with whom you can share feelings and find acceptance are a bedrock in times of change and uncertainty.
The Role of Intimacy
Many classic theories about the development of self in early adulthood focus on the value of establishing committed and meaningful relationships with others. We begin this section with Erikson’s early adult challenge of intimacy vs. isolation and the perspectives of other thinkers such as psychologists George Valliant and Daniel Levinson and writer Gail Sheehy.
Theory of Psychosocial Development
Erikson’s theory of psychosocial development in early adulthood is called intimacy vs. isolation, reflecting the challenge of establishing close and trusting relationships with others. While these relationships might include romantic or sexual ones, Erikson was clear that psychological intimacy can be achieved in any relationship in which you demonstrate “the ability to fuse your identity with someone else’s without the fear that you are going to lose something yourself” (Evans, 1967, p. 48), and that trusting partnerships can be found in the context of “friendship, combat, leadership, love, and inspiration” (Erikson, 1959, p. 101) (Figure 12.7).
Erikson asserted that intimacy, whether with a close friend, fellow soldier, or romantic partner, requires a commitment that builds trust, but also vulnerability and willingness to sacrifice and compromise. Those unwilling to experience it are likely to become psychologically and socially isolated. On the surface this developmental challenge can appear to undermine the need for increasing independence and self-sufficiency that characterizes many of the developmental tasks discussed earlier. However, research on early adulthood is clear: Social connectedness is key to a successful early adult transition. Indeed, early adulthood is associated with increasing feelings of family obligation, and those who report feeling needed and useful to their friends and family are more likely to also report receiving greater support and experiencing higher well-being during the early-adult transition (Fuligni & Pederson, 2002; Fuligni et al., 2022) (Figure 12.8).
Related Theories of Early Adult Development
Based on his 60-year longitudinal study of more than 500 men as they embarked on adulthood, psychologist George Valliant (1977, 1993, 2002) affirmed Erikson’s developmental framework and the early adult challenge of intimacy vs. isolation, in particular as it applied to men in the cohort Valliant studied. But Valliant added two new elements: First, he inserted a transitional stage at the end of early adulthood that he called “career consolidation,” a time to reconcile the early-adulthood tasks of intimacy and career exploration and a bridge to the generative priorities of middle adulthood.
Second, Valliant documented that adults cope with the stress and anxieties of developmental tasks by using defense mechanisms, which vary in their effectiveness and maturity. In the context of intimacy vs. isolation, Valliant identified “affiliation” as one of the most mature and healthy coping mechanisms. Affiliation allows us to reduce the anxiety of developmental tasks by confiding in others and being willing to ask for and receive their help and support in solving problems. On the other hand, Valliant described “help-rejecting complaining” as an immature defense mechanism that keeps others at a distance at the expense of healthy development. Adults employing this response to anxiety will complain about their problems and yet reject offers to help, judging the suggestions as useless or “not good enough” (Di Giuseppe & Perry, 2021).
Psychologist Daniel Levinson also saw developmental value in establishing connections with others in early adulthood. Calling the developmental stages “eras,” Levinson’s Seasons of Life theory of adult development describes a transitional period of exploration between ages 17 and 22. During this time, young adults modify their relationships with friends and family to develop the independence needed to progress into the era of early adulthood. Levinson’s early adulthood era is characterized by pursuing life goals, such as leaving the parent’s home, as well as starting a career and marriage. Levinson suggests that the path to achieving these goals can be facilitated by a close mentoring relationship with a role model who can guide and support the young adult’s emerging independence and maturity, particularly in the workplace.
Like Valliant’s, Levinson’s theory was originally based on a longitudinal study of adult men. With his collaborator and wife Judy, however, Levinson later conducted a smaller-scale study on a cohort of career women born between 1936 and 1947, to examine the validity of his theory as applied to women. After her husband’s death, Judy Levinson published the results of this work in The Seasons of a Woman’s Life (1996). While the study found many similarities in men’s and women’s transitions and eras of early adulthood, it found women faced greater obstacles in reconciling education, career, and family responsibilities. They also met with greater gender discrimination in their career development, and they found it more difficult to establish effective mentoring relationships in the workplace because available mentors were usually men. As a result, many of the women studied described their husbands as their primary source of career mentoring and support, exhibiting a more direct link between the developmental tasks of intimacy and career development than their men counterparts did.
While Daniel Levinson was framing his theory of adult development in men, writer Gail Sheehy was researching the lives of men and women in their 20’s, 30s, and 40’s to explore the reality of adult development in the 20th century. In the book Passages (1976), based on her work, Sheehy colorfully mapped out the decades of adulthood:
- “Tryout Twenties”: Age 18-30 is a “provisional adulthood” where there is room to explore options during a “prolonged adolescence,” when young people are still defined by others’ expectations.
- “Turbulent Thirties”: Age 30-40 is the first experience of true adulthood, in which individuals take on real adult roles and responsibility and challenge the idealistic aspirations of early adulthood.
- “Flourishing Forties:” Age 40-50 begins a “second adulthood,” fueled by a midlife crisis during which adults take stock of the goals and achievements of their “first adulthood” and attempt to realign their priorities to confidently and optimistically pursue meaningful goals in the second half of life.
The book was wildly popular for Sheehy’s engaging and relatable insights and was eventually named by the Library of Congress as one of the most influential books of its time. Twenty years later, Sheehy published the follow-up New Passages (1995), in which she more carefully examined the latter half of adulthood from her own perspective as an older adult. In this sequel, Sheehy noted that societal and cultural changes had created noticeable cohort differences in the developmental experience of adults from different generations, and that earlier conceptions of the stages of adulthood were outdated. She rejected the one-size-fits-all description of adult development that she and others had earlier endorsed, instead drawing attention to the way longer lifespans create increased opportunities for modern adults to “customize our own life cycle” in a way not possible decades earlier.
Personality Traits: Evidence for Stability and Change
While the development of self in adulthood is, in part, an adaptation to the developmental tasks encountered at this stage of life, our personality is also inextricably tied to our sense of self. The Five-Factor Model (FFM) is the most widely accepted framework psychologists use for describing individual differences in personality. With it they can measure where individuals fall on a continuum of five traits: Openness to experience, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism (OCEAN). According to the originators of this model, these traits reflect biologically based tendencies that interact with environmental influences such as culture to predict how we will respond to life changes such as the challenges of early adulthood. All this interaction culminates in our evolving sense of self.
The Five-Factor model views our individual personality traits as relatively stable predispositions more likely to drive development rather than to develop themselves (Roberts & Davis, 2016). For example, during early adulthood, a person high in extraversion might explore careers that require regularly working with large groups of people. In this example, personality is influencing the developmental task of career exploration. Exploring careers well-suited to our individual personality traits in early adulthood is advisable, especially because research shows that the level of a given individual personality trait tends to remain stable over time relative to its level in others, a phenomenon known as rank-order stability. That is, a person who demonstrates high levels of extraversion isn’t likely to become very introverted over time. In fact, rank-order stability increases during early adulthood (Ferguson, 2010).
However, even if a person’s ranking on a personality trait isn’t likely to change substantially with age, that doesn’t mean it cannot respond to life events with small but adaptive changes. A mean-level change describes the extent to which the level of a personality trait can fluctuate over the lifespan. This fluctuation may occur in response to cultural changes, historical events, and role changes. For example, the developmental tasks of emerging adulthood may explain why research finds mean level changes such as an increase in emotional stability and conscientiousness during early adulthood (Roberts & Davis, 2016). According to the social investment theory of personality development, as young people begin to commit to adult roles, including romantic relationships and school and work responsibilities, their personality responds with small but measurable increases in agreeableness, conscientious, and openness and decreases in neuroticism (Roberts et al., 2006, 2016; Wagner et al., 2015; Schwaba et al., 2018; Schwaba et al., 2019). They may react to the responsibilities of school and work with an increase in the goal-oriented organization found in the trait of conscientiousness. This association has been supported cross-culturally (Bleidorn et al., 2013). The increase or decrease of certain traits with age to effectively adapt to the demands of development is known as the maturity principle of personality development.
Young adults may also draw on stable support systems, both internal and external, to facilitate their development. Personality has a remarkable ability to both direct the trajectory of developmental tasks in early adulthood and adapt to changing roles and responsibilities. It is like a sturdy rubber band that can support our sense of self while also stretching to meet our changing needs.
Link to Learning
Where do you rank on the Big 5 personality traits? Take this Big Five Personality Test self-assessment to learn more about your level of openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. Consider how your level of each trait might have enabled or adapted to the developmental tasks or roles relevant to your life right now.
References
American Psychological Association (2023, November 15). Self. In APA dictionary of psychology. Retrieved 8/12/2024, from https://dictionary.apa.org/self
Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
Bahney, A. (2023, August 24). Home affordability is the worst it has been since 1984. CNN Business. https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/24/homes/home-affordability-worst-since-1984/index.html
Bauer-Wolf, J. (2023, May 22). About 75 percent of students want to attend college—but far fewer expect to actually go. Higher Ed Dive. https://www.highereddive.com/news/youthtruth-college-enrollment-expectations-reality-higher-ed/650803/
Berkes, E., & Gaetani, R. (2023). Income segregation and the rise of the knowledge economy. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 15(2): 69–102. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20210074
Bleidorn, W., Klimstra, T. A., Denissen, J. J. A., Rentfrow, P. J., Potter, J., & Gosling, S. D. (2013). Personality maturation around the world: A cross-cultural examination of social-investment theory. Psychological Science, 24(12), 2530–2540. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613498396
Bühler, J. L., Weidmann, R., Nikitin, J., & Grob, A. (2019). A closer look at life goals across adulthood: Applying a developmental perspective to content, dynamics, and outcomes of goal importance and goal attainability. European Journal of Personality, 33(3), 359–384. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2194
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2023). Young adults and the Affordable Care Act: Protecting young adults and eliminating burdens on families and businesses. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cms.gov/cciio/resources/files/adult_child_fact_sheet
Dabis, H., & Yates, J. (2014). Successful navigation of the stormy seas: What factors lead to a successful transition from the quarterlife crisis? Coaching Psychologist, 10(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpstcp.2014.10.1.17
Di Giuseppe, M., & Perry, J. C. (2021). The hierarchy of defense mechanisms: Assessing defensive functioning with the Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales Q-sort. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 718440. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.718440
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. Norton
Evans, R. I. (1967). Dialogue with Erik Erikson. Harper.
Ferguson, C. J. (2010). A meta-analysis of normal and disordered personality across the life span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(4), 659–667. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018770
Fry, R., Passel, J. S., & Cohn, D. (2020, September 4). A majority of young adults in the U.S. live with their parents for the first time since the Great Depression. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/09/04/a-majority-of-young-adults-in-the-u-s-live-with-their-parents-for-the-first-time-since-the-great-depression/
Fuligni, A. J., & Pedersen, S. (2002). Family obligation and the transition to young adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 38(5), 856–868. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.5.856
Fuligni, A. J., Smola, X. A., & Al Salek, S. (2022). Feeling needed and useful during the transition to young adulthood. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 32(3), 1259–1266. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12680
Hasyim, F. F., Setyowibowo, H., & Purba, F. D. (2024). Factors contributing to quarter life crisis on early adulthood: A systematic literature review. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 17, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S438866
Hatfield, J. (2023, May 3). Young adults in the U.S. are less likely than those in most of Europe to live in their parents’ homes. Pew Research. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/05/03/in-the-u-s-and-abroad-more-young-adults-are-living-with-their-parents/
Krings, F., Bangerter, A., Gomez, V., & Grob, A. (2008). Cohort differences in personal goals and life satisfaction in young adulthood: Evidence for historical shifts in developmental tasks. Journal of Adult Development, 15(2), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-008-9039-6
Levinson, D. J. (1996). The seasons of a woman’s life. Ballantine.
Lindow, S., & Lang, A. (2022). A lifespan perspective on decision-making: A cross-sectional comparison of middle childhood, young adulthood, and older adulthood. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 35(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2268
McGurran, B., & Hahn, A. (2023, May 9). College tuition inflation: Compare the cost of college over time. Forbes Advisor. https://www.forbes.com/advisor/student-loans/college-tuition-inflation/
Menchaca, A., Pratt, B., Jensen, E., & Jones, N. (2023, May 22). Examining the racial and ethnic diversity of adults and children. U.S. Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/blogs/random-samplings/2023/05/racial-ethnic-diversity-adults-children.html
Neugarten, B. L., Moore, J. W., Lowe, J. C. (1965). Age norms, age constraints, and adult socialization. American Journal of Sociology, 70, 710–717. https://doi.org/10.1086/223965
Panchal, S., & Jackson, E. (2007). ‘Turning 30’ transitions: Generation Y hits quarter-life. The Coaching Psychologist, 3(2), 46–51. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpstcp.2007.3.2.46
Pekel-Uludağlı, N., & Akbaş, G. (2019). Young adults’ perceptions of social clock and adulthood roles in the Turkish population. Journal of Adult Development, 26(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-018-9298-9
Robbins, A., & Wilner, A. (2001). Quarterlife crisis: The unique challenges of life in your twenties. TarcherPerigee.
Roberts, B. W., & Davis, J. P. (2016). Young adulthood is the crucible of personality development. Emerging Adulthood, 4(5), 318–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696816653052
Roberts B. W., Walton K., Bogg T., Caspi A. (2006). De-investment in work and non-normative personality trait change in young adulthood. European Journal of Personality, 20(6), 461–474. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.607
Roberts B. W., Walton K., & Viechtbauer W. (2006). Personality changes in adulthood: Reply to Costa & McCrae (2006). Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 29–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.29
Scales, P. C., Benson, P. L., Oesterle, S., Hill, K. G., Hawkins, J. D., & Pashak, T. J. (2015). The dimensions of successful young adult development: A conceptual and measurement framework. Applied Developmental Science, 20(3), 150–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2015.1082429
Schwaba, T., Luhmann, M., Denissen, J. J. A., Chung, J. M., & Bleidorn, W. (2018). Openness to experience and culture-openness transactions across the lifespan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(1), 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000150
Schwaba, T., Robins, R. W., Grijalva, E., & Bleidorn, W. (2019). Does openness to experience matter in love and work? Domain, facet, and developmental evidence from a 24-year longitudinal study. Journal of Personality, 87(5), 1074–1092. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12458
Shanahan, E., & Busseri, M. A. (2019). A systematic review of the relationship between perceived life script event age and valence across the life span [Supplemental material]. Psychology and Aging, 34(5), 698–708. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000362.supp
Sheehy, G. (1976). Passages: Predictable crises of adult life. Ballantine Books.
Sheehy, G. (1995). New passages: Mapping your life across time. Random House.
Swartz, T. T., Hartmann, D., & Rumbaut, R. G. (2017). Crossings to adulthood: How diverse young Americans understand and navigate their lives. Brill.
Switek, M., & Easterlin, R.A. (2018). Life transitions and life satisfaction during young adulthood. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19, 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9817-y
The National Center for Higher Education Management Systems. (2018). College participation rates: College-going rates of high school graduates—directly from high school [Data set]. NCHEMS. http://www.higheredinfo.org/dbrowser/?year=2018&level=nation&mode=data&state=&submeasure=63
U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). Annual estimates of the resident population by sex, age, race, and Hispanic origin for the United States: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2019 (NC-EST2019-ASR6H) [Data set]. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-kits/2020/population-estimates-detailed.html
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). Baccalaureate and Beyond (B&B:16/17): A First Look at the Employment and Educational Experiences of College Graduates, 1 Year Later (NCES 2019-106; Table 2) [Data set]. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=569
Vaillant, G. E. (1993). Wisdom of the ego. Harvard University Press.
Vaillant, G. E. (2002). Aging well: Surprising guideposts to a happier life from the landmark Harvard study. Little, Brown Spark.
Vespa, J. (2017). The changing economics and demographics of young adulthood: 1975–2016. U.S. Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2017/demo/p20-579.pdf
Wagner, J., Becker, M., Lüdtke, O., & Trautwein, U. (2015). The first partnership experience and personality development: A propensity score matching study in young adulthood. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(4), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614566092