Julianne Zedalis; John Eggebrecht

Science Practice Challenge Questions

31.

At a time when the theory of evolution was controversial (the year following the Scopes Monkey Trial), Macallum (Physiological Reviews, 2, 1926) made an observation that is still contested by some who do not see the pattern in the data below showing percentages (g solute /100 g solution) of major biologically important inorganic elements in a variety of sources.

	Na⁺	K⁺	Ca⁺²	Mg⁺²	Cl^–
Ocean water	0.306	0.011	0.012	0.0037	0.55
Lobster	0.903	0.0337	0.0438	0.0156	1.547
Dog fish	0.5918	0.02739	0.01609	0.0146	0.9819
Sand shark	0.6173	0.0355	0.0184	0.0172	1.042
Cod	0.416	0.0395	0.0163	0.00589	0.6221
Pollock	0.4145	0.017497	0.01286	0.00608	0.5613
Frog	0.195	0.0233	0.00627	0.00155	0.2679
Dog lymph	0.3033	0.0201	0.0085	0.0023	0.4231
Human
Blood	0.302	0.0204	0.0094	0.0021	0.389
Lung	0.2956	0.02095	0.00839	0.0021	0.3425
Testes	0.3023	0.01497	0.00842	0.001914	0.3737
Ab- dominal cavity	0.2935	0.0164	0.0091	0.00184	0.3888

Table 2.3

A. Using a spreadsheet, or by sharing calculations with your classmates, construct a quantitative model of these data from these percentages as ratios of mass fractions relative to that of sodium, %X/%Na. Of course, you will not be asked to use a spreadsheet on the AP Biology Exam. However, the ability to develop a quantitative model through the transformation of numerical data can be assessed. The question that led Macallum to investigate the elemental composition of different species and compare these with the composition of seawater follows from the central organizing principle of biology: the theory of evolution.

B. The elements in the table above all occur in aqueous solution as ions. The net charges on the inside and outside of a cell are both zero. A very large difference in the concentrations of ions, though, results in stresses that the cell must expend energy to relieve. Based on this constraint on the total number of ions, connect this refined model based on ratios of ion concentration rather than absolute ionic concentrations to the modern concept of shared ancestry.

Frequently, a follow-up question regarding scientific data on the AP Biology Exam will ask you to pose questions that are raised by the data. Credit will be awarded for scientific questions. These questions usually look for a cause-and-effect relationship, and are testable.

C. Examine relative concentrations of potassium and magnesium ions in terrestrial and marine organisms. Pose a question that could be investigated to connect concentrations of these ions to adaptations to a change in the environment.

Macallum noted the high potassium to sodium ratio relative to seawater, and made this claim about what the ratio implied about the oceans of early Earth:

“At once it is suggested that as the cell is older than its media is [presently] the relative proportions of the inorganic elements in it are of more ancient origin than the relative proportions of the same amount of elements which prevail in the media, blood plasma and lymph or in the ocean and river water of today.”

D. In your own words, summarize the argument that Macallum is using to justify this claim.

32.

Approximately half the energy that flows through the Earth’s biosphere is captured by phytoplankton, photosynthetic microscopic organisms in the surface waters of the oceans. Scientists think the growth of phytoplankton in the Atlantic Ocean is limited by the availability of nitrogen, whereas growth in the Pacific Ocean is limited by the availability of iron.

The concentration of oxygen (O₂) in the atmosphere of early Earth was low and, therefore, so was the concentration of dissolved oxygen in the early ocean. Because insoluble iron oxides (rust) do not form in the absence of oxygen, soluble iron ions (Fe²⁺) were more available in the early ocean than at present since the concentration of oxygen is high. Nitrogen (N₂), while always abundant in the atmosphere, was not available until the evolution of molybdenum-based nitrogen-fixing proteins.

This figure is titled Concentrations of iron and molybdenum in ocean waters. It contains two graphs. Both graphs are line graphs that have two category labels on the X axis: surface waters and deep ocean. The top graph shows the concentration of molybdenum, abbreviated capital M lowercase O. Less than 1.25 billion years ago, the M O concentration was steady at 10 to the minus 4 in both surface waters and deep ocean. During the period of transition, the M O concentration just below the 10 to the minus 4 line in surface waters but dropped in the deep ocean. Greater than 1.85 billion years ago, the M O concentration in both surface waters and deep ocean was steadily at the reduced levels found in the deep ocean during the period of transition. The bottom graph shows the concentration of iron, abbreviated capital F lowercase E. Greater than 1.85 billion years ago, the F E concentration was steady near the top of the graph in both surface waters and deep ocean. During the period of transition, the F E concentration rose sharply in surface waters almost to the line for Greater than 1.85 billion years ago. It then dropped to a slightly lower lever and remained steady there in the deep ocean. Less than 1.85 billion years ago, the F E concentration in both surface waters and deep ocean was steadily at 10 to the minus 6, below that of both other plot lines. — Figure 2.31

The graph is a scatter plot that shows dissolved seawater ratio relative to carbon on the y-axis, ranging from 10 to the minus 8 to 10 squared. The graph shows cellular ratio relative to carbon on the y-axis, ranging from 10 to the minus 8 to 10 squared. A diagonal trend line rises at a 45 degree angle from the bottom left to the upper right of the graph. The following elements cluster in the lower left corner of the plot line, within the 10 to the minus 4 values for both axes: C D, C O, M N, F E, C U, Z N, N I, and M O. The following elements cluster near the upper right corner of the plot line, above 10 to the minus 2 values for both axes: S R, P, N, K, C A , S I, S, M G, and C. — Figure 2.32

The graphs (Anbar and Knoll, Science, 297, 2002) show models of concentrations of two trace elements, iron (Fe) and molybdenum (Mo), in ocean waters. The model describes the change over time of these elements from early Earth (>1.85 billion years ago, Gya) to a modern era (<1.25 Gya) and a period of transition between these. Surface waters of the oceans lie to the left of the vertical double line. Modern concentrations of dissolved iron and molybdenum (relative to dissolved carbon) are shown.

A. The principle chemical processes of life today have been conserved through evolution from early Earth conditions. Using this fact, justify the selection of these data shown in the graphs in the construction of a model of ocean photosynthetic productivity.

Iron and molybdenum are two of 30 elements that are required by the chemical processes supporting life on Earth. Concentrations of these two and 15 others are shown in the graph at the right. Of these elements, the three most abundant in cells are also found in seawater in approximately the same concentrations. By increasing the mass of phytoplankton in the ocean, we may be able to compensate for the increasing concentration of carbon produced by the combustion of gas, oil, and coal.

B. Select, with justification, the element or elements that, if added in large amounts to the ocean, could boost the growth of phytoplankton.

C. Before implementing a large-scale geo-engineering effort to avert the effects of climate change due to carbon pollution, we must test the legitimacy of this solution. Describe a plan for collecting data that could be used to evaluate the effect of enrichment on phytoplankton productivity.