Activity
Use the following scenario to answer questions 1 - 2.
Andre and Priya used different strategies to solve the following inequality, but they reached the same solution.
Make sense of each strategy until you can explain what each student has done.
Andre | Priya |
---|---|
Testing to see if is a solution: The inequality is false, so 4 is not a solution. If a number greater than 3 is not a solution, the solution must be less than 3, or . |
In , there is on the left and on the right. If is a negative number, could be positive or negative, but will always be positive. For to be true, 𝑥 must include negative numbers or 𝑥 must be less than 3. |
Summarize the strategy Andre used to solve the inequality.
Compare your answer: Your answer may vary, but here is a sample. Andre solved the companion equation and found . Then, he tested a number greater than 3. That created a false mathematical statement so he concluded that any number greater than 3 would not be a solution.
Summarize the strategy Priya used to solve the inequality.
Compare your answer: Your answer may vary, but here is a sample. Priya solved the companion equation and found . Then, she reasoned that the left side of the equation, , could be either negative or positive while the right side of the equation, , would always be positive - if negative values for are substituted into the expressions. So, the possible values for need to include both positive and negative numbers. That happens when the values are less than 3.
Examine four inequalities:
Inequality A:
Inequality B:
Inequality C:
Inequality D:
Work with a partner to decide on at least two inequalities to solve. Solve one inequality using Andre's strategy (by testing values on either side of the given solution), while your partner uses Priya's strategy (by reasoning about the parts of the inequality). Switch strategies for the other inequality.
Compare your answer: Your answer may vary, but here are some samples.
Inequality A:
- . Sample reasoning (after solving to get
- Using Andre's strategy: Test a value more than or less than -50, and check to see if that value gives a true statement when substituting back to the original inequality.
- Using Priya's strategy: If is a negative number that is far away from 0, say -100, then will be less than, not greater than, -10. This means the solutions must include positive numbers, so the solutions must be greater than -50.
Inequality B:
- Sample reasoning using Priya's strategy (after solving and
getting :
- After dividing each side by 4, the left side of the inequality has , while the right side has . This means the expression on the left side will be less than that on the right when includes positive numbers, so must be greater than or equal to -1. (In other words, for most negative values of , will be less than , which would make the inequality untrue.)
Inequality C:
- Sample reasoning using Priya's strategy (after solving to get
):
- If includes large positive numbers, then will be smaller than 36, so must include positive numbers which are greater than -4.
- If is less than -4, then it would include negative numbers like -10, which means the value of would be a positive number that is greater than 36, which makes the inequality untrue. So the solution must be greater than -4.
Inequality D:
- Sample reasoning using Priya's strategy (after solving and getting :
- The right side of the inequality has while the left side has . If is a large positive number, will be less than . If is a negative number, will be positive and greater than , so the solution must include negative numbers which are less than 6.
Are you ready for more?
Extending Your Thinking
Using positive integers between 1 and 9 and each positive integer at most once, fill in values to get two constraints so that is the only integer that will satisfy both constraints at the same time. ▢x + ▢ <▢x + ▢
Compare your answer:
Your answers may vary, but here is a sample.
Using positive integers between 1 and 9 and each positive integer at most once, fill in values to get two constraints so that is the only integer that will satisfy both constraints at the same time. ▢x + ▢ >▢x + ▢
Compare your answer:
Your answers may vary, but here is a sample.
Self Check
Additional Resources
Reasoning about Solution Sets to Linear Inequalities
You can derive a lot of information about the solution set to an inequality by studying the inequality itself.
Let’s look at the inequality shown.
The left side of the inequality contains . The right side of the inequality contains .
We can think to ourselves: “What values of would make greater than ?”
If is a large positive number, then will still be positive. If is a large positive number, then will be a negative number. This makes the inequality true, so the solution set must include large positive numbers.
Let’s solve the related equation.
Since we know that the solution set must include large positive numbers, then must be the solution to the inequality.
Try it
Try It: Reasoning about Solution Sets to Linear Inequalities
For questions 1 - 2, solve the related equation for each inequality. Use what you know about the inequality to determine the solution set.
Compare your answer:
The solution . Since any positive number substituted for makes a negative value, then the solution set cannot include positive numbers. This means the solution is .
Compare your answer:
The solution . Since any positive number substituted for makes a positive value, the solution set cannot include positive numbers. This means the solution is .