Chapter Outline
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) fundamentally challenges the design engineer’s way of thinking. It takes all the design rules and best practices learned over a century of the industrial age and turns the majority of them upside down. No longer is design freedom constrained by the traditionally held rules of fabrication processes like machining and casting. In fact, there are almost no fabrication penalties for complicated designs in AM given the flexible toolpath and layer-by-layer nature of the build process.
AM machines often use a laser, extruder, or other tool to selectively fuse or deposit material. The “toolpath” – as in the laser or extruder nozzle path – in an AM machine is not inhibited by the complexity of the part being designed. The AM toolpath is only constrained to that of the robotics of the machine rather than the shapes of conventional tools as in the case of traditional subtractive processes like machining, which remove material away versus add it layer-by-layer. A complex geometry, or in the machine’s language, a tool path, has little to no bearing on how “hard” the machine works. Combined with the layering technique, the part in fabrication is never in the way of itself or the toolpath, yielding near-infinite geometrical possibilities.
However, despite the seemingly endless design possibilities with DfAM, there are considerations on how to approach the process the correct way in order to avoid expensive post-processing and support removal, for instance. This chapter details an approach for designing parts to be viably fabricated with additive manufacturing, acknowledging both the exciting potential and technical nuances to AM processes. Within this chapter, design content will cover metal powder bed fusion, directed energy deposition, polymer selective laser sintering, and polymer material extrusion.